Everything discussed in this book must have already been discussed by
someone at one time, in one context or another. We just do not yet
know who it was discussed by and when.
The principles (postulates) of energy theory state the following.
The Universe, in all of its parts ranging from the minimal to the
maximal is constantly pulsating, compressing energy in some parts and
accordingly rarefying it in others.
The Universe is to be considered in terms of three independent
constituents (general coordinates): Energy, Space, and Time. The
essence (main feature) of the Universe is the motion of Energy and
Energy fields in Space--Time, nonexistent separately from each other.
In the absence of motion, no fields exist; in the absence of fields,
no motion is present. Only energy fields exist--potential,
kinetic, electric, magnetic, gravitational, and all other fields.
Only energy interaction exists--gravitational, electromagnetic,
nuclear, or any other. There exist no absolute motion and hence no
absolute fields, but only relative motion and relative fields.
Energy is to be divided into Material and Spiritual energies.
Relative motion of bunches of material energy is accessible to the
human sensory system (possibly enhanced by special-purpose
instruments), but relative motion of bunches of spiritual energy is
inaccessible to the human senses.
The concept of a physical process viewed as a process in general is
absolute. In human mind, a physical process determines (implies)
relative motion of energy in space and time, and therefore is always
unidirectional. This property of physical processes is mentally
associated by Humankind with the concept of Time--a
one-dimensional unidirectional coordinate accounting for the course of physical processes in the Universe. A physical process is always
occurring, and therefore relative motion is either present or not.
The dimensionality of Space is determined solely by the requirements
of prognostic calculations of the relative motion of energy bunches or
of their energy interaction in a chosen mathematical model. In
everyday life in terrestrial conditions, three one-dimensional
bidirectional coordinates have been sufficient for Humankind to
coordinate its consciousness in
The concept of Energy has been adopted by Humankind as bidirectional
coordinatization of the course of physical processes.
Mass is not a measure of inertia or of gravity but a reduced
(conventional) measure of energy contained in the part of space--time
occupied by material bodies. Mass is a measure of the relative
potential or kinetic energy in the absence or presence of relative
motion of material bodies (bunches of energy), a measure reduced to
terrestrial conditions. Mass is independent of relative parameters of motion (relative velocities or the frequency of relative interaction)
of material bodies viewed as bunches of energy.
The World surrounding us is reflected in the Consciousness of Humankind as a certain Knowledge of this World, as an understanding of the laws governing its existence, which are passed on from generation
to generation in the form of information accumulated on material media
and with the help of information perceptible by the senses (speech,
music, painting, writing, and so on). The consciousness of Humankind
overall, as well as the consciousness of an individual, is also an
information medium, but it has essential differences from material
media because (besides the relation to the World provided by the
senses) it is endowed with a capacity for analysis, generalization,
and, most importantly, affection and empathy, i.e., is also a medium
carrying spiritual information.
Humankind has always sufficed with the Knowledge that it has acquired
to any given moment of its existence, but this Knowledge is constantly
being advanced (developed, updated, and enriched), which constitutes
one of the most important needs of the human race.
Today, from the heights of the 21st century, we realize that time has
come for a refined and updated reviewal of some principal foundations
of the physical science that were accepted more than four hundred
years ago in the 17th century and survived till the early 21st
century as applied physical theories.
The purpose of this book is to develop and update a small part of this
Knowledge in the form of principles (postulates), and in some cases as
hypotheses open to discussion. In no way do we disregard the part of Knowledge currently accumulated in the form of physical theories and
confirmed by human practice; this knowledge can only be somewhat
refined and clarified in what follows in the framework of the
postulates formulated below.
To represent the surrounding World in Consciousness and to communicate
in any of the existing languages, Humankind uses the so-called
concepts (comprehension of the World), which have their own names
(identifiers) in each language. Part of the concepts that are only
used in habitual communication, or parts of the underlying concepts,
always differ from one another by their qualitative or quantitative
properties and features. A special group among all concepts is
comprised by scientific concepts of physics, some of which can be
quantified, i.e., have a dimension and hence proper measurement units.
All concepts used by Humankind, and the physical concepts in
particular, are absolute.
For individual human beings, their own existence in the surrounding
World is absolute. Collectively with this World, man mentally
constructs his own Universe as an absolute notion, and
then extends this absolutism, most often subconsciously, to everything
around him. Man feels his relativeness only in interaction
with fellow human beings, with the ambient World, with Nature.
All in the World surrounding us -- all that was, all that is, and
all that will be -- is definite and specific, being the results of physical processes, accomplished facts. But the progress toward these
results is relative, it depends on a large number of conditions (both
initial and those relevant in the process), and hence the resulting
values, allowing comparison in terms of quantity and quality, are also
Everything occurring in the World, in Nature, and in Life is
Precisely this is the "relativity theory," already known to and felt by
"ancient" philosophers as a mundane "relativity principle"
stating that "everything depends on which side you look at it from."
Scientific (physical) versions of this principle include the Galilei
relativity principle, special and general relativity theories, and,
possibly, some other versions that have not yet been given a name in
If any characteristic, any quantitative and qualitative feature of the
results of physical processes is conventional and relative, then the
general physical laws, formulated by Humankind (by Science) and called
"fundamental," expressed mathematically in the form of equations and
quantitatively determining the results of physical processes, also are
relative, conventional, i.e., are valid under certain
conditions and assumptions. The physical science will sooner or later
have to comply with this.
Nature does have absolute laws, and it proves this by its very
existence! But there are no absolute laws of Nature written in the
language of Humankind (in the language of mathematics in particular)
and embracing all the variety of physical processes occurring in
Nature! All of these laws relative! One such law is the
Energy Conservation Law or, more precisely, the Law of Energy
conservation in Space and Time, and yet more precisely, the
Law of conservation of a part of Energy in a part of Space and
in a part of Time.
As a universal principle for all physical process, the relativity
principle was first formulated by H.Poincar'e. As regards
A.Einstein (with all respect to this outstanding scientist), his
mathematical exercises in physics are related to this "ancient"
principle rather vaguely. His mathematical exercises in his works on
electrodynamics of moving bodies could be called a "relativity
theory" only by someone with a very keen sense of humor.
Representatives of modern physical schools never allow the
"validity" of Einstein's theory to be discussed in scientific world,
similarly to those religious and scientific authorities who in the
lifetime of Copernicus and Galilei were unwilling to
accept scientific views of the surrounding World discordant with the
theories of the great ancient scientists Aristotle and Ptolemy that
were dominant at the time.
The author certainly realizes that all said in this book about the
essence of the relevant problems is not the absolute truth,
not the ultimate truth. Everything to be said below is also relative,
i.e., conventional, and is determined by the general framework of contemporary Knowledge.
No ageless truths exist! But all theories must live their
life to the end, until Humankind accumulates new Knowledge obtained
from experience and from the practice of its existence, which can then
allow modifying these theories or refuting them altogether.
This book might not aspire to being a substantive scientific treatise
as this is understood by part of the modern scientific community,
because of the tendency of the author to mainly use qualitative ideas
and estimates for explaining the essence of the problems.
Therefore, in this book ("treatise," to use the word preferred by
- we deliberately omit any mathematical calculations that for
a good part of the scientific community may be a hindrance in
understanding the essence of the relevant problems (of the expounded
material) and which would require a justification of the use of the
various conditions, assumptions, and restrictions inherent in
- we discuss the material in terms of the currently accepted
scientific concepts and notions, and do not allow introducing new
physical concepts and definitions that are not known to the majority
of the scientific community (notably, the known concepts in most
cases suffice for our purposes).
According to E.Fermi, one of the greatest physicists of the 20thnbsp;century,
" physical essence of a problem that is genuinely understood
can be explained without complicated formulas." The ability to explain the crux of a problem in
simple, elementary terms determines the true understanding of physical laws.
Overall, this book is devoted not only to problems of physics-based
understanding of the surrounding World but also to philosophical
comprehension of this World, i.e., to philosophy of natural sciences
at the level of the contemporary scientific Knowledge.
Any pieces of knowledge about the material World in general and the
processes occurring in it constitute the information
passed by Humankind from generation to generation,
together with the belief in the truth of this information. Most of these elements of knowledge are verified by experience of the human
existence, although any given individual is incapable of embracing,
let alone verifying, their validity. Therefore, the faith in the
truth of knowledge (which is relative!) is somewhat akin to religion.
This faith is nourished mostly by education, but also by
indoctrination, via the so-called "mass media," in both genuine
knowledge, i.e., experimentally verified results and facts, and false
knowledge, i.e., untested (or deliberately corrupted) results and
facts (misinformation). Information itself is passed on from one
subject to another (or from one community to another) since "ancient
times," with the help of sound for words, and light and color for
images (graphs, letter, painting).
Our use of standard scientific terms and concepts that have long been
in use and which therefore require no explanation or deciphering may
produce the illusion of a long acquaintance with many of the proposals
formulated here, which are apparently self-evident. The more so
because many physicists have analyzed the proposed principles
(postulates) one way or another, and may have come close to a similar
In the late 19th century, Poincare, who was a great mathematician
rather than a physicists, was the first to declare the existence of what was then termed the "crisis" of classical physics. There can
in principle be no crises in the human understanding of laws governing
the existence of the Universe, however. There may only be
insufficiency in the Knowledge and the impossibility of the
explanation of emerging experimental data based on the existing
physical theories. We can only speak of a gradual approximation to
the understanding of the laws governing the Universe, with the aim of a more precise prediction of physical processes and phenomena
occurring in the World surrounding us.
That was a crisis of the "absoluteness" of the laws of Nature
formulated mathematically under certain conditions and assumptions,
a crisis of extending the validity of these mathematical constructions
to the assessment of physical phenomena and processes occurring in all
of the unmeasurable (in Space and Time) Universe, a crisis of the
understanding of the "absoluteness" of Space and Time prevailing in
the late 19th--early 20th century.
Many of Poincare's ideas have not been realized in physical theories
such as, in particular, the special and general relativity theories
and quantum mechanics, to the elaboration of which he had come quite
close, but then stopped for some obscure reasons. He may have had his
own good reasons for that.
To go ahead is the job of scientists of the 21st century after they
refine several established and popularly accepted physical theories
that have already become "obvious," as well as after they renounce
several delusions regarding the infinitude of the energy that the
human race will be able to utilize for its purposes in the future.
Main postulates in brief
1. Mass is not a measure of inertia or a measure of gravity. Mass is the
measure of relative energy contained in an isolated energy
system, a measure reduced to terrestrial conditions. Mass is
a reduced measure of relative potential energy in the absence of relative motion and a reduced measure of relative kinetic energy in
the presence of relative motion of energy bunches in the system.
2. The Universe is Energy, Space, and Time--the independent
coordinates in the Universe, none of which can exist alone. Parts
of Energy, Space, and Time cannot be physically equal to zero.
3. Motion and Fields are a characteristic of the Universe,
a characteristic of Energy--Space--Time. The existence of Motion
implies Fields, and vice versa, the existence of Fields implies
4. The Universe, in any of its parts ranging from minimal to
maximal, is constantly pulsating, leading to energy contraction in
some parts and, accordingly, energy rarefaction in some others.
5. The Motion (existence) of Energy in the Universe occurs in an Energy
field, subdivided into a potential field (the field of energy
contraction) and a kinetic field (the field of energy expansion).
Relative motion of energy bunches in space--time occurs under the
action of the mutual relative (potential--kinetic, electromagnetic,
gravitational--antigravitational) energy field.
6. The motion of energy from one part of space--time to another
part filled with energy is accompanied by resistance in the form of mutually balanced real forces. A force is the measure of resistance
to the compression or expansion of energy in space--time in the
course of motion in the existing energy fields. The real force
interaction occurs after energy redistribution at the "boundary"
of energetic media.
7. Nothing definite can be stated about the motion of an energy
system that is not energetically interacting with other systems. No
absolute (nonrelative) motion exists.
8. The dimension of Space--Time is relative (conventional).
Space--Time is multi-dimensional and can be represented by any value
of its dimension corresponding to a prognostic solution of a practical problem.
9. The energy of an isolated system of interacting energy objects
(systems) is the sum of their proper (potential and kinetic)
energies and the mutual relative (potential and kinetic) energies.
10. In a prognostic calculation of the relative motion of energy
bunches, their relative rotation must be taken into account as the
existence of mutual kinetic fields and a manifestation of real